Cut lists for the teams that actually own the decision.
AlignCube gives every stakeholder the same operating record: what to cut, what to keep, what needs evidence, who owns it, and what route has to happen before anyone acts.
Different teams, same source of truth.
Finance needs confirmed savings. Engineering needs ownership clarity. Security needs proof before anything moves. AlignCube gives every team the same operating record — and takes no commissions from any tool it scores.
Use spend and renewal evidence to find overlap, rank savings, and walk into budget review with a savings number you can defend.
- Duplicate coverage and owner overlap
- Same-day cut list for budget review
- Confirmed vs. estimated savings trail
Keep the technical context attached to each recommendation, so you can vet a cut in seconds instead of opening a research project.
- Model and coding-tool overlap review
- Decision log for keep/cut calls
- Remediation actions tracked to completion
Separate attractive savings from defensible actions by showing sensitive-data exposure, vendor risk, and missing evidence.
- Evidence confidence by data source
- Security and vendor-review routing
- Approval trail for audit readiness
The risk surface changes by market.
The workflow stays consistent, but the evidence threshold changes when the stack touches regulated data, privileged work, production code, or model infrastructure.
Finance
Vendor risk, customer data, transaction workflows, and explainability all need a clear decision record.
Bar: audit-ready recordHealthcare
AlignCube tracks vendor cost, ownership, and other non-clinical metadata only. Do not enter PHI — AlignCube is not offered for PHI processing.
Boundary: vendor metadata onlyLegal
Research, drafting, e-discovery, and privileged data tools require tighter owner and data-source context.
Bar: data-source contextDevTools & SaaS
Coding assistants, model APIs, automation tools, and shadow AI can sprawl faster than finance sees them.
Bar: usage + ownerFrom messy stack to accountable action.
This is the route every stakeholder shares, whether the problem starts as cost waste, AI risk, or renewal pressure.
Load evidence
Paste the tool list or import the billing, usage, renewal, security, and owner data you already have.
Build cut list
Separate clean cuts from blocked decisions, review items, and consolidation opportunities.
Route owner
Send the next step to finance, security, procurement, the tool owner, or the exec sponsor.
Keep record
Preserve the memo, timeline, blockers, approvals, outcome, and savings proof for the next review.
Finance sees dollars. Engineering sees overlap. Security sees exposure. It’s the same record.
One stack record, three lenses — no copy-paste between teamsStart with one stack snapshot.
Then route the decisions to the people who need to sign off.