One record for the teams that actually own the decision.
AlignCube gives every stakeholder the same operating record: what to cut, what to keep, what needs evidence, who owns it, and what route has to happen before anyone acts.
Different teams, same decision record.
Finance needs captured outcomes. Engineering needs ownership clarity. Security needs proof before anything moves. AlignCube gives every team the same operating record, and takes no commissions from any tool it scores.
Use spend and renewal evidence to find overlap, rank what is identified to cut, and walk into budget review with a reviewable number you can defend line by line.
- Duplicate coverage and owner overlap
- Same-day decision record for budget review
- Reviewable vs. captured trail (Monitor)
Keep the technical context attached to each recommendation, so you can vet a cut in seconds instead of opening a research project.
- Model and coding-tool overlap review
- Decision log for keep/cut calls
- Remediation actions tracked to completion (Monitor)
Separate attractive cuts from defensible actions by showing sensitive-data exposure, vendor risk, and missing evidence.
- Evidence confidence by data source
- Security and vendor-review routing (Monitor)
- Approval trail for audit readiness (Monitor)
The risk surface changes by market.
The workflow stays consistent, but the evidence threshold changes when the stack touches regulated data, privileged work, production code, or model infrastructure.
Finance
Vendor risk, customer data, transaction workflows, and explainability all need a clear decision record.
Bar: audit-ready recordHealthcare
AlignCube tracks vendor cost, ownership, and other non-clinical metadata only. Do not enter PHI. AlignCube is not offered for PHI processing.
Boundary: vendor metadata onlyLegal
Research, drafting, e-discovery, and privileged data tools require tighter owner and data-source context.
Bar: data-source contextDevTools & SaaS
Coding assistants, model APIs, automation tools, and shadow AI can sprawl faster than finance sees them.
Bar: usage + ownerFrom messy stack to accountable action.
This is the route every stakeholder shares, whether the problem starts as cost waste, AI risk, or renewal pressure.
Load evidence
Paste the tool list or import the billing, usage, renewal, security, and owner data you already have.
Score every tool
Separate clean cuts from blocked decisions, review items, and consolidation opportunities.
Route owner
Assign each decision to whoever has to sign it: finance, security, procurement, or the tool owner. They open the record; you send the memo. Owner routing runs on the Monitor plan.
Keep record
Preserve the memo, timeline, blockers, approvals, outcome, and recorded proof for the next review.
Finance sees dollars. Engineering sees overlap. Security sees exposure. It’s the same record.
One stack record, three lenses, no copy-paste between teamsStart with one stack snapshot.
Then route the decisions to the people who need to sign off.
The free audit gives you every call with the reasoning on every line. Monitor adds the operating layer: owner routing, approvals, captured tracking, and the monthly re-check.